polymathwannabe comments on What do rationalists think about the afterlife? - Less Wrong

-16 Post author: adamzerner 13 May 2014 09:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (99)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 15 May 2014 04:13:51AM -2 points [-]

What if they're still experiencing and feeling things, but are just incapable of communicating this to us at the time, and are incapable of remembering it?

A hypothesis thus described is untestable. Moreover, it's inconsequential: the observed result is the same regardless of whether the hypothesis is true or not. In such a case, the hypothesis can be safely ignored because it adds nothing to our models.

Comment author: adamzerner 15 May 2014 04:30:53AM 0 points [-]

1) Untestable doesn't mean wrong.

2) What about the possibility that we just can't do a good job of measuring peoples' consciousness given our level of technology?