Risto_Saarelma comments on Want to work on "strong AI" topic in my bachelor thesis - Less Wrong

1 Post author: kotrfa 14 May 2014 10:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (16)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Risto_Saarelma 17 May 2014 11:58:33AM 0 points [-]

So far I'd count AIXI and whatever went into building IBM Watson (incidentally, what did go into building it, is there a summary somewhere about what you'd want to study if you wanted to end up capable of working on something like that?) as reasonably significant steps. AIXI is pure compsci, and I haven't heard anything about insights from cognitive science playing a big part in getting Watson working compared to plain old math and engineering effort.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 17 May 2014 01:37:02PM 1 point [-]

I'd count the predictive coding model and probably also GWT as larger steps than AIXI. I'm not sure where I'd put Watson.

incidentally, what did go into building it, is there a summary somewhere about what you'd want to study if you wanted to end up capable of working on something like that?

Here is a paper about how Watson works in general, and here's another about how it reads a clue. (Unsurprisingly, machine learning, natural language processing, and statistics skills seem relevant.)