John_Maxwell_IV comments on [LINK] Prisoner's Dilemma? Not So Much - Less Wrong

4 Post author: torekp 20 May 2014 11:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 21 May 2014 12:37:49AM 3 points [-]

Do we have reason to think that games where both players make their move simultaneously are more important than games where you get to see your opponent's move before you make yours, or other game structures?

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 21 May 2014 05:48:03AM *  6 points [-]

My priors are that most important social situations are not best modeled as simultaneous games.

In a formal game, the player must make his move all the way, he is not allowed pauses, feints or tentative half-moves whose second half depends on the equally tentative reactions, tâtonnements of the other player. In the state of nature a player, before even making a half-move, may make speeches, brandish his weapon, cajole, etc. Depending on the other player's reaction or rather on his reading of it, he may walk away (if the other stands his ground), or strike a blow (either because the other looks about to strike first, or because he is looking the other way), or perhaps hear and consider an offer of Danegeld.

-- Anthony de Jasay, The State