What's wrong with that? I'd say it's a prevalent problem when trying to formalize complicated concepts.
Like I said in my original comment, it's stating your opinion without giving any reason to believe in that opinion. If you don't say why you believe that it's an issue with the formalism rather than the concept, you're adding more noise than information. Facts are better than opinions.
Scott Aaronson, complexity theory researcher, disputes Tononi's theory of consciousness, that a physical system is conscious if and only if it has a high value of "integrated information". Quote:
http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1799