rationalnoodles comments on Rationality Quotes June 2014 - Less Wrong

9 Post author: Tyrrell_McAllister 01 June 2014 08:32PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (279)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jiro 02 June 2014 02:41:17PM 14 points [-]

Maybe so, but this also assumes that you're good at determining who's an idiot. Many people are not, but think they are. So you need to consider that if you make a policy of "don't argue with idiots" widespread, it will be adopted by people with imperfect idiot-detectors. (And I'm pretty sure that many common LW positions would be considered idiocy in the larger world.)

Consider also that "don't argue with idiots" has much of the same superficial appeal as "allow the government to censor idiots". The ACLU defends Nazis for a reason, even though they're pretty obviously idiots: any measures taken against idiots will be taken against everyone else, too.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 June 2014 12:18:42PM *  4 points [-]

Many people are not, but think they are. So you need to consider that if you make a policy of "don't argue with idiots" widespread

I posted this quote on site with average IQ above 99th percentile for a reason. Also, please read the original comment for context, I think you'll interpret it a bit differently.

Comment author: Jiro 04 June 2014 03:16:21PM 6 points [-]

Having a high IQ does not equate to having a good idiot detector.

Also, policies which treat people differently based on a self-serving distinction need more justification than normal, because of the increased prior that the person making the policy is affected by an ulterior motive.