9eB1 comments on Political ideas meant to provoke thought - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (141)
As far as "be a sheep"; most people are doing this already to some extent. They draw their opinions from a combination of media they watch and friends and social groups they identify with. Directly evaluating a policy can be very difficult, so they instead rely on a network of trusted opinions.
Letting people do it totally passively, however, could be bad. We know that people lean heavily towards default behavior when possible. So if the person you mirror starts deviating substantially from what you expect of them, you will be unlikely to change your preferences in a timely manner.
There's a whole host of other problems with such a system that make its marginal advantages seem not worthwhile.
Capitalism vs socialism debates generally happen without acknowledging that the vast majority of the world uses a relatively narrow spectrum of hybrid systems. Some free markets, some social safety nets and regulations.
Pure socialism and pure free markets have rarely existed at any sort of scale or for any substantial length of time.
You could designate a group of people to set your vote for you (since we are sheep, we should call them wolves, but of course that doesn't strike the right emotional chord [except that it might foreshadow a foreseeable outcome of such a program]), and fall back on personal research if there isn't a majority or supermajority or whatever.
I believe they're called "political parties".
Some people find sheep, flock, and Shepherd quite emotionally satisfying metaphors.
Well, as long as the Shepherd is a supernatural being with the power to grant eternal life... :-)
Well, now I feel dumb.