= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
NancyLebovitz comments on Come up with better Turing Tests - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (44)
Random thought: Could a computer program pass for human while commenting at slatestarcodex?
The "nonspecific praise" approach fooled me the first time I saw it, but it gets pretty obvious after a while.
Ditto the "extract declarative statements, act incredulous" approach.
Certainly a few commenters there easily pass for computers.
Why not? (1) You are not required to respond to other people's comments. (2) People generally don't suspect you of being a chatbot on a blog, so they will not test you explicitly.
So the chatbot could be designed to play safe, and reply only in situations it believes it understands.