James_Miller comments on [tangential] Bitcoin: GHash just hit 51% - Less Wrong

5 Post author: David_Gerard 14 June 2014 08:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: asr 14 June 2014 06:26:15PM *  8 points [-]

The attack that people are worrying about involves control of a majority of mining power, not control of a majority of mining output. So the seized bitcoins are irrelevant. The way the attack works is that the attacker would generate a forged chain of bitcoin blocks showing nonsense transactions or randomly dropping transactions that already happened. Because they control a majority of mining power, this forged chain would be the longest chain, and therefor a correct bitcoin implementation would try to follow it, with bad effects. This in turn would break the existing bitcoin network.

The government almost certainly has enough compute power to mount this attack if they want.

Comment author: James_Miller 14 June 2014 08:09:57PM 1 point [-]

For how long would you have to control the computing power? Would having control of a massive number of computers for a few minutes be enough?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 15 June 2014 01:45:07AM 6 points [-]

The more damage you want to do the longer it takes.

Would having control of a massive number of computers for a few minutes be enough?

Definitely not. To give you a sense of scale, a new bitcoin block comes out every five minutes and it would take control of the block chain for multiple 'ticks' to do serious damage.

Comment author: [deleted] 16 June 2014 09:45:16AM 2 points [-]

a new bitcoin block comes out every five minutes

Ten minutes, on average.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 17 June 2014 12:45:28AM 2 points [-]

Thanks.