Douglas_Knight comments on [tangential] Bitcoin: GHash just hit 51% - Less Wrong

5 Post author: David_Gerard 14 June 2014 08:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 15 June 2014 12:54:24AM 5 points [-]

While it doesn't allow invalid transactions, it does enable rolling back other people's transactions, by a combination of rolling back time and rejecting a class of transactions, such as a particular address. In particular, it allows ignoring all other miners and taking all the newly mined coins.

It's true that the further back in time you want to rewind, the more computational resources. In particular, the further back in time you want to go, the more time it takes to accomplish the maneuver. But if you are a consortium of miners, you were going to spend these resources mining, and the total number of blocks is fixed, so does it cost electricity? I'm not sure.