Stuart_Armstrong comments on An extended class of utility functions - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (2)
Yes, I was not looking at subtleties like that :-)
Your table is correct.
EDIT: your table is correct, but there are some extra unimportant subtleties - like the fact that under "bet", you don't have a u, only an expected u.