Stuart_Armstrong comments on An extended class of utility functions - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 17 June 2014 04:36PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (2)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 18 June 2014 07:12:53AM *  1 point [-]

Yes, I was not looking at subtleties like that :-)

Your table is correct.

EDIT: your table is correct, but there are some extra unimportant subtleties - like the fact that under "bet", you don't have a u, only an expected u.