= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Luke_A_Somers comments on False Friends and Tone Policing - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (49)
In order to have a useful conversation about the topic it will be necessary to challenge his implicit claim. If he insists on making that impossible then its not possible to have a reasonable conversation with him.
For certain conversations, yes. Others, no.
For conversations about the topic that don't involve you conceding all points to him, yes.
I suggest that these conversations could include whether his way of interpreting that position is correct.