capybaralet comments on Conservation of expected moral evidence, clarified - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 20 June 2014 10:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (10)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: capybaralet 30 July 2016 01:52:00PM 0 points [-]

"So conservation of expected moral evidence is something that would be automatically true if morality were something real and objective, and is also a desiderata when constructing general moral systems in practice."

This seems to go against your pulsar example... I guess you mean something like: "if [values were] real, objective, and immutable"?

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 01 August 2016 09:10:26AM 0 points [-]

Sorry, I don't get your point. Could you develop it?