army1987 comments on Illusion of Transparency: Why No One Understands You - Less Wrong

57 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 October 2007 11:49PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Noumenon 22 October 2007 03:53:08AM 3 points [-]

I'd have to hear the voice mail message to believe what you're saying. In my daily life, when one of my friends says, "That's great. Just great" it's totally clear whether he's being sarcastic or not. Because he intends to sound sarcastic, and changes his inflection.

Now in this case the message was the same, so the inflection didn't carry any content. But the subjects were told Mark was leaving a message for his friend. So it's a reasonable assumption that Mark is using an inflection that his friend will recognize as sarcasm. I would assume that unless, as in the second case, they told me he was trying not to show sarcasm.

Comment author: [deleted] 12 April 2012 03:53:23PM *  4 points [-]

http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2868

(Yes, I know I'm replying to a 2007 comment with a link to a 2010 blog post.)

Comment author: thomblake 12 April 2012 04:04:32PM 8 points [-]

Yes, I know I'm replying to a 2007 comment with a link to a 2010 blog post.

Totally reasonable. Unless the tone was "you'd know this if you'd only bothered to read the 2010 post first".

Which I observed once as a comment to a post by Eliezer linking to a much-later post by Eliezer.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 12 April 2012 04:23:19PM 11 points [-]

This only seems unreasonable to us because we haven't yet read the 2015 post about acausal reference.

Comment author: thomblake 12 April 2012 04:27:53PM 1 point [-]

Well then that commentor should have linked to that 2015 post.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 12 April 2012 04:49:55PM 6 points [-]

Sadly, the AHTML markup syntax won't be available until 2017.

Comment author: dlthomas 12 April 2012 05:17:39PM 1 point [-]

Hmm, with the proper content-based indexing...