whales comments on Open thread, 30 June 2014- 6 July 2014 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: DanielDeRossi 30 June 2014 10:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (246)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: whales 01 July 2014 08:22:30AM 6 points [-]

I've collected some quotes from Beyond Discovery, a series of articles commissioned by the National Academy of Sciences from 1997 to 2003 on paths from basic research to useful technology. My comments there:

The articles (each around 8 pages) are roughly popular-magazine-level accounts of variable quality, but I learned quite a bit from all of them, particularly from the biology and medicine articles. They're very well written, generally with input from the relevant scientists still living (many of them Nobel laureates). In particular I like the broad view of history, the acknowledged scope of the many branches leading to any particular technology, the variety of topics outside the usual suspects, the focus on fairly recent technology, and the emphasis bordering on propagandist on the importance and unpredictability of basic research. It seems to me that they filled an important gap in popular science writing in this way.

I'm interested in histories of science that are nonstandard in those and other ways (for example, those with an unusual focus on failures or dead ends), and I'm slowly collecting some additional notes and links at the bottom of that page. Do you have any recommendations? Or other comments?

Comment author: polymathwannabe 01 July 2014 05:42:10PM 3 points [-]

The series Connections (and Connections 2 and 3) was excellent in tracing relationships between the multiple threads of the history of science.

Comment author: whales 05 July 2014 07:25:30PM 0 points [-]

Yes, that's a good example, thanks.