VipulNaik comments on The insularity critique of climate science - Less Wrong

9 Post author: VipulNaik 09 July 2014 01:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (39)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: VipulNaik 11 July 2014 03:11:38AM 0 points [-]

The full correspondence is here:

http://www.theclimatebet.com/?page_id=4

Maybe it's lame (?) but I don't think they're being deceptive -- they're quite explicit that Gore refused to bet.

The fact that he refused to bet could be interpreted either as evidence that the bet was badly designed and didn't reflect the fundamental point of disagreement between Gore and Armstrong, or as evidence that Gore was unwilling to put his money where his mouth is.

I'm not sure what interpretation to take.

btw, here's a bet that was actually properly entered into by both parties (neither of them a climate scientist):

http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2014/06/bauman_climate.html