katydee comments on Double Illusion of Transparency - Less Wrong

51 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 24 October 2007 11:06PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MrHen 09 February 2010 08:14:03PM 5 points [-]

Books are enough for understanding anything, you'd just need good from-the-ground-up textbooks and probably months or years to read them.

In practice, this isn't true. Some people really do have trouble learning from books. Simply reading the book aloud to them is enough to overcome the block.

I don't know where the problem originates, however. It seems strange to chalk it up to lack of motivation or stupidity, given the people I know.

In other words, books contain all of the knowledge necessary to understand anything but not everyone can pick up the understanding itself from a book. Why, I don't know.

Comment author: arfle 08 December 2010 12:51:17AM 0 points [-]

Is it sufficient to read the book aloud to them even if you don't understand it yourself? If so why isn't there a profession of ill-educated freelance book-readers?

Comment author: katydee 08 December 2010 01:43:07AM 3 points [-]

Many tutors are more or less exactly that.

Comment author: arfle 08 December 2010 08:11:28PM 1 point [-]

Really? One on one? I've certainly been to many 'read-out-the-textbook' lectures, but there's a good point to those, which is why I went. One on one I'd feel very robbed.

Comment author: MarkusRamikin 05 December 2013 08:13:49AM 0 points [-]

there's a good point to those

What's that?

Comment author: hyporational 05 December 2013 12:07:24PM *  1 point [-]

You can ask questions from an expert on the fly.

That's not enough to make me not hate lectures.