Lumifer comments on Why Are Individual IQ Differences OK? - Less Wrong

39 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 26 October 2007 09:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (526)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 21 August 2013 01:02:16AM 3 points [-]

I am not aware of that "main debate". In the US, at least, political climate makes it impossible to discuss race issues in public. The courts, of course, have to decide these issues, but that hardly constitutes debate.

Comment author: metastable 21 August 2013 01:05:17AM 0 points [-]

Fair enough. For "main debate" please read "pertinent legal question."

Comment author: Lumifer 21 August 2013 02:03:00AM 2 points [-]

Well then, we've come to stating that the pertinent legal question is whether the use of IQ tests in hiring falls under "business necessity". I don't know of any answer to that other than "it depends".

Though the issue of whether a job really requires high IQ is an interesting one...

Comment author: fubarobfusco 22 August 2013 03:50:12AM -1 points [-]

In the US, at least, political climate makes it impossible to discuss race issues in public.

Race issues are discussed constantly in the U.S. — often, but not always, under guises such as "immigration" or "the War on Drugs" or "failing schools".

However, certain views are broadly discredited, for instance those which attribute or imply differences in the moral value of people's lives on the basis of their race.