= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ThisSpaceAvailable comments on A simple game that has no solution - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (123)
"Classical game theory says that player 1 should chose A for expected utility 3, as this is better than than the sub game of choosing between B and C "
No since this is not a subgame because of the uncertainty. From Wikipedia " In game theory, a subgame is any part (a subset) of a game that meets the following criteria...It has a single initial node that is the only member of that node's information set... "
I'm uncertain about what TDT/UDT would say.
Can you give an example a pair G1, G2 such that you consider G2 to be a "subgame" of G1?