What exactly do you mean with the word "consider" in that sentence? I think your trivial idea of what it might mean isn't accurate enough to be useful in a case like this.

Well, I didn't personally interview Kasparov so I don't know any more than you do about what the article I read meant by 'consider' although it seems like a fairly unambiguous word to me. Simply tabooing every word in a discussion isn't necessary helpful, it can simply slow the conversion down.

The idea that reading something from the brain takes no time or effect from the brain to parse the thought in a readable way is inaccurate.

Why should this require any extra effort on the part of the brain? Surely if you can read the relevant area of the brain, and have the computing power and understanding of neuroscience required, then any thought is readable. Are you a neuroscientist?