gwern comments on Fifty Shades of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy - Less Wrong

18 Post author: PhilGoetz 24 July 2014 12:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (86)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 05 August 2014 05:25:15PM 1 point [-]

I don't understand what this means. How can she have screenshots of E.L. James's FF.net official view statistics, if FF.net does not make the numbers public? Did James hand them out freely to 'various writers'?

She had screenshots that various writers had sent her. I infer that James was one of those writers, but she didn't say that outright.

Comment author: gwern 05 August 2014 06:17:51PM *  3 points [-]

I infer that James was one of those writers, but she didn't say that outright.

That's the basis for your 2 million number, the number which largely determines the result, some guesswork about something your source never says and probably would have said if it was actually the case? Then the entire analysis is bunk - garbage in, garbage out. And you should especially not infer that low number of total pageviews when everything else disagrees with it.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 04 November 2015 06:17:16AM *  0 points [-]

You can send her an email and ask her yourself. She came up with the 2 million number for this particular story; she said she came up with numbers for stories based on screenshots. It isn't too hard to connect the dots.

Comment author: gwern 04 November 2015 07:34:29PM *  -1 points [-]

You can send her an email and ask her yourself.

Give me a break - why should I have to do that when a plain reading suggests otherwise and you're the one trying to make these sweeping generalizations based on your own guesswork?