philh comments on Announcing the 2014 program equilibrium iterated PD tournament - Less Wrong

24 Post author: tetronian2 31 July 2014 12:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: philh 02 August 2014 10:27:31AM 1 point [-]

If you run out of time, you defect. If your opponent simulates you without a time limit, and you take long enough to cause ver to run out of time, ve'll defect, which isn't what you want.

But there's a function that lets you run a function for up to a specified number of microseconds, and tells you what it returns or whether it times out.

Comment author: brazil84 02 August 2014 09:04:13PM 2 points [-]

If you run out of time, you defect. If your opponent simulates you without a time limit, and you take long enough to cause [him] to run out of time, [he'll] defect, which isn't what you want.

I'm not sure about that - the original post says this:

the penalty for not outputting Cooperate or Defect within the time limit has been reduced.

So presumably most bots will be set up to make a choice within the time limit.

But there's a function that lets you run a function for up to a specified number of microseconds, and tells you what it returns or whether it times out.

Right, so the practical effect of the strategy I proposed would be to deny opponents knowledge. Of course, one can envision situations where you want to be transparent.