shminux comments on [LINK] 2014 Fields Medals and Nevanlinna Prize anounced - Less Wrong

2 Post author: Sarunas 13 August 2014 10:58AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (17)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wallowinmaya 13 August 2014 01:26:24PM 0 points [-]

I think Bostrom puts it nicely in his new book "Superintelligence":

A colleague of mine likes to point out that a Fields Medal (the highest honor in mathematics) indicates two things about the recipient: that he was capable of accomplishing something important, and that he didn't.

Comment author: shminux 13 August 2014 09:42:35PM 7 points [-]

What award does the recipient get if they actually accomplish "something important"?

Comment author: Vulture 14 August 2014 01:23:26PM 1 point [-]

Not really an answer, but one could say that a scientist should conduct their research with one hungry eye on the Nobel Peace Prize.

(Obviously, this is a quip; cf medical research etc etc. But I think it conveys the spirit pretty well)

Comment author: Lumifer 14 August 2014 03:55:54PM 3 points [-]

conduct their research with one hungry eye on the Nobel Peace Prize.

Specifically the Nobel Peace Prize is pretty much discredited nowadays, it became a rather meaningless political gesture.

Comment author: Stabilizer 14 August 2014 10:13:55PM -1 points [-]

Nobel Prizes, especially in physiology/medicine and economics, are probably more indicative of social impact (which is what I think Bostrom's colleague meant when he used the word "important").

Comment author: shminux 14 August 2014 10:47:05PM 4 points [-]

He was explicitly talking about mathematicians, in math Fields medal is the equivalent of Nobel. Besides, the same exact criticism Bostrom levels against Fields can be applied to Nobels.