ancientcampus comments on An example of deadly non-general AI - Less Wrong

13 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 21 August 2014 02:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (25)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ancientcampus 23 August 2014 06:18:12PM 1 point [-]

Regarding the "reducing mortality" example, in biostats, mortality is "death due to X, divided by population". So "reducing cardiovascular mortality" would be dangerous, because it might kill its patients with a nerve poison. Reducing general mortality, though, shouldn't cause it to kill people, as long as it agrees with your definition of "death." (Presumably you would also have it list all side effects, which SHOULD catch the nerve-poison &etc.)

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 24 August 2014 03:50:32PM 1 point [-]

It can also prevent births. And if it has a "reduce mortality rate in 50 years time" kind of goal, it can try and kill everyone before those 50 years are up.