Stuart_Armstrong comments on The Great Filter is early, or AI is hard - Less Wrong

19 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 29 August 2014 04:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (74)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 30 August 2014 12:52:24AM *  2 points [-]

Once AI is developed, it could "easily" colonise the universe.

I also see this claimed often but my best guess also is that this might likely be the hard part. Getting into space is already hard. Fusion could be technologically impossible (or not energy positive).

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 30 August 2014 08:26:15AM 1 point [-]

Fission is sufficient.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 30 August 2014 09:36:29AM 2 points [-]

Is this an opinion or a factual statement. If the latter I'd like to see some refs.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 30 August 2014 08:00:48PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 30 August 2014 09:59:20PM 2 points [-]

Thank you. An interesting read. I found your treatment very thorough given its premises and approach. Sadly we disagree at a point which you seem to take as given without further treatment but which I question:

The ability and energy to set-up infrastructure to exploit interplanetary resources with sufficient net energy gain to sufficiently mine mercury (much less build a dyson sphere).

The problem here is that I do not have refereneces to actually back my opinion on this and I didn't have enough time yet to build my complexity theoretic and thermodynamics arguments into a sufficiently presentable form.

http://lesswrong.com/lw/ii5/baseline_of_my_opinion_on_lw_topics/

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 01 September 2014 06:00:43PM 2 points [-]

energy to set-up infrastructure to exploit interplanetary resources with sufficient net energy gain to sufficiently mine mercury

We already have solar panel setups with roughly the required energy efficiency.