Stuart_Armstrong comments on The Great Filter is early, or AI is hard - Less Wrong

19 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 29 August 2014 04:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (74)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 30 August 2014 09:36:29AM 2 points [-]

Is this an opinion or a factual statement. If the latter I'd like to see some refs.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 30 August 2014 08:00:48PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 30 August 2014 09:59:20PM 2 points [-]

Thank you. An interesting read. I found your treatment very thorough given its premises and approach. Sadly we disagree at a point which you seem to take as given without further treatment but which I question:

The ability and energy to set-up infrastructure to exploit interplanetary resources with sufficient net energy gain to sufficiently mine mercury (much less build a dyson sphere).

The problem here is that I do not have refereneces to actually back my opinion on this and I didn't have enough time yet to build my complexity theoretic and thermodynamics arguments into a sufficiently presentable form.

http://lesswrong.com/lw/ii5/baseline_of_my_opinion_on_lw_topics/

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 01 September 2014 06:00:43PM 2 points [-]

energy to set-up infrastructure to exploit interplanetary resources with sufficient net energy gain to sufficiently mine mercury

We already have solar panel setups with roughly the required energy efficiency.