Human social networks don't exactly work like that.
Apparently they do. The study references e.g. “The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment,” which is an controlled social network of real humans exhibiting basically this behavior:
First, it's an artificial, experimental network of real humans. Second, the adoption rates in that study top out at 50-60%. The paper in the OP concerned itself with finding a seed set which will produce a 100% adoption.
Large Social Networks can be Targeted for Viral Marketing with Small Seed Sets
It shows how easy a population can be influenced if control over a small sub-set exists.
This is relevant for LW because
a) Rational agents should hedge against this.
b) An UFAI could exploit this.
c) It gives hints to proof systems against this 'exploit'.