soreff comments on Rationality Quotes September 2014 - Less Wrong

8 Post author: jaime2000 03 September 2014 09:36PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (379)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Azathoth123 15 September 2014 12:08:09AM 7 points [-]

You know how people are always telling you that history is actually really interesting if you don’t worry about trivia like dates? Well, that’s not history, that’s just propaganda. History is dates. If you don’t know the date when something happened, you can’t provide the single most obvious reality check on your theory of causation: if you claim that X caused Y, the minimum you need to know is that X came before Y, not afterwards.

Steve Sailer

Comment author: soreff 15 September 2014 12:44:11AM 1 point [-]

Or that the interval between X and Y is spacelike, and neither is in the other's forward light cone... :)

Comment author: shminux 15 September 2014 11:52:02PM 4 points [-]

Some day the light speed delay might become an issue in historical investigations, but not quite yet :) Even then in the statement "if you claim that X caused Y, the minimum you need to know is that X came before Y, not afterwards" the term "before" implies that one event is in the causal future of the other.