DavidAgain comments on Deception detection machines - Less Wrong

2 [deleted] 05 September 2014 08:15PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DavidAgain 06 September 2014 08:03:53AM 1 point [-]

To me it sounds like the full information provided to avoid being incomplete would be so immense and complex that you'd need another AI just to interpret that! But I may be wrong.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 September 2014 03:50:27PM 1 point [-]

The data is immense, but the deeception detector's job involves only applying simple rules. It's effectively a compressor that compresses the AI logs down to "utility functions + search parameters" which is small enough to be inspected directly.