It’s that most forecasters aren’t actually seriously and single-mindedly trying to see into the future.
Of course, they're trying to sell their forecasting services.
If they were, they’d keep score and try to improve their predictions based on past errors.
Would an "expert" want to keep data that could potentially refute his claim to expertise?
Would an "expert" want to keep data that could potentially refute his claim to expertise?
If there would be a general belief that experts who don't are bad at forecasting he might keep data to signal that he follows best practices.
It's just a better of spreading the knowledge that people who don't keep score don't make good predictions.
How to see into the future, by Tim Harford
The article may be gated. (I have a subscription through my school.)
It is mainly about two things: the differing approaches to forecasting taken by Irving Fisher, John Maynard Keynes, and Roger Babson; and Philip Tetlock's Good Judgment Project.
Key paragraph: