= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Lumifer comments on Omission vs commission and conservation of expected moral evidence - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (7)
Hm. I don't think this is an (c)omission issue and I don't really see what does it have to do with morality. What you are describing is what might be called "judge hacking" -- modifying entity responsible for determining success so that it declares success regardless of what happens (or, in a bit more general case, changing the success criteria).