Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Ender comments on Fake Optimization Criteria - Less Wrong

24 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 10 November 2007 12:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Ender 23 August 2011 09:37:33PM 1 point [-]

The mention of music and evolution sent me off on a tangent, which was to wonder why human brains have a sense of music. A lot of music theory makes mathematical sense (the overtone series), but it seems odd from an evolution standpoint that musicianship was a good allele to have.

Comment author: ialdabaoth 02 May 2013 04:07:12PM 0 points [-]

I believe the current theory is that musical talent was a sexual selection criteria that 'blew up'. Good rhythm, a good singing voice, and an ability to remember complex rhythm were originally linked to timing and muscle coordination, and so helped to signal for hunting fitness; and to intelligence, and so helped to signal for the ability to navigate the pack's social landscape. But once sexual selection for a trait begins, that trait can take on a life of its own, leading to things like peacocks' tails and lyre bird's mating calls.