I think it's arguing a level below where I'm coming from (though possibly there's some self-similarity here).
None of this quite settles the question of whether “free will” is actually a crucial ingredient in the best theory of human beings we can imagine developing.
I think it isn't. Which makes the rest of the page true but irrelevant.
As per a recent comment this thread is meant to voice contrarian opinions, that is anything this community tends not to agree with. Thus I ask you to post your contrarian views and upvote anything you do not agree with based on personal beliefs. Spam and trolling still needs to be downvoted.