Salemicus comments on What's the right way to think about how much to give to charity? - Less Wrong

10 Post author: irrational 24 September 2014 09:42PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (72)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Salemicus 25 September 2014 06:54:55PM 0 points [-]

It's not a strawman, I linked to an actual website. No, those people don't call themselves Effective Altruists, but they are engaged in altruism and are trying to be effective. EA is an outcome, not a process, and the EA movement has no patent on it. Yes, it's a weakman, in that I deliberately chose an obviously ineffective charity. But my opinion of the rest of the EA movement is not much higher. The comparison is neither bed nets nor deworming - according to GiveWell's top ranked charity, it's sending money unmonitored, and hoping against 60 years of experience that this actually improves things rather than just being a leaky bucket.

Comment author: ChristianKl 26 September 2014 10:45:13AM 1 point [-]

it's sending money unmonitored, and hoping against 60 years of experience that this actually improves things rather than just being a leaky bucket.

There not much experience with sending money directly. Most of aid spending traditional went to big organisations and not to individual people in form of money.