pnrjulius comments on Protein Reinforcement and DNA Consequentialism - Less Wrong

26 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 13 November 2007 01:34AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: dlthomas 25 October 2011 04:05:30PM 1 point [-]

It takes so long to learn instincts by mutation and selection, it's intuitively obvious that learning should come first and then be replaced by instinct over time. But Lorenz didn't propose a mechanism for that to happen and I don't know a mechanism either.

The mechanism seems straightforward: evolution by mutation and natural selection. If a species is in a stable (enough) environment, and the learning process is costly in energy, time, or both (and there will necessarily be some cost), then those who don't have to learn as much will be selected for.

Comment author: pnrjulius 07 June 2012 12:39:49AM 1 point [-]

There's an evolutionary principle that corresponds to exactly this---learned behaviors that evolve to become innate---but I can't remember the name of it and it's very hard to google for things you can't remember the name of.

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 28 August 2012 08:21:11PM 3 points [-]

the Baldwin effect