hyporational comments on Questions on Theism - Less Wrong

23 Post author: Aiyen 08 October 2014 09:02PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (188)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: hyporational 09 October 2014 04:31:42PM 0 points [-]

Ok, poor choice of words. Change it to "doesn't stating that predict anything about his behavior?"

Comment author: RichardKennaway 09 October 2014 04:34:05PM 0 points [-]

What would you predict that you would not already predict from the longer description?

Comment author: hyporational 09 October 2014 05:07:57PM *  2 points [-]

The longer description is a specific type of psychosis. If I was told someone was psychotic I would expect them to behave erratically in some way. In the case of the longer description I would expect them to behave erratically in a more specific way. Different kinds of psychoses are prone to continue and develop in certain ways and have certain affective and somatic components which makes even the descriptions valuable even if the causal mechanisms are not properly understood.

In the example the patient has a Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome, a rare case of psychosis where brain imaging is part of the diagnosis. Because we have identified this specific kind of a pattern of behavior and imaging findings, we know the person is unlikely to recover, will continue to wildly confabulate, and medications are of no help.