KatjaGrace comments on Superintelligence 8: Cognitive superpowers - Less Wrong

7 Post author: KatjaGrace 04 November 2014 02:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (95)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: KatjaGrace 04 November 2014 02:09:17AM 2 points [-]

Can you think of strategically important narrow cognitive skills beyond those that Bostrom mentions? (p94)

Comment author: diegocaleiro 06 November 2014 08:15:23AM *  4 points [-]

Let's abandon for a second the notion of strategically important, and just list human cognitive skills and modules, as they appear distributed in our cognition, according to the MIT The Cognitive Neurosciences (2009), and also as they come to mind while writing:

  • Nurturing

  • Lust

  • Exploration

  • Moral reasoning

  • Agentism (animism, anthopomorphizing etc...)

  • Language processing

  • Proprioception

  • Attachment

  • Priming

  • Allocating attention

  • Simulation of future events

  • Dreaming

  • Empathizing

  • Volition

  • Consciousness

Now it's up to commenters to try and come up with reasons why these would be strategically important. Maybe they are, and then we'd have to verify if they are or not encompassed by the categories suggested by Bostrom. I don't have time to go through each in detail, but wanted to lay out a path for others who may find this useful.

Comment author: Sebastian_Hagen 04 November 2014 09:14:00PM *  2 points [-]

Novel physics research, maybe. Just how useful that would be depends on just what our physics models are missing, and obviously we don't have very good bounds on that. The obvious application is as a boost to technology development, though in extreme cases it might be usable to manipulate physical reality without hardware designed for the purpose, or escape confinement.