singularitard comments on question: the 40 hour work week vs Silicon Valley? - Less Wrong

13 Post author: Florian_Dietz 24 October 2014 12:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (107)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: singularitard 24 October 2014 03:13:33PM 10 points [-]

I would probably be able to get the same amount of work done in a 30 or even 20 hour week, given the amount of time wasted on meetings/email/waiting for data in an average office. Boss wouldn't want to pay me the same for a 20hr work week though.

Comment author: Bruno_Coelho 28 October 2014 10:34:49PM 0 points [-]

Bet if companies cut in half the number of 'meetings', the productivity gain would be good enough to make a 40h/week for a lot of workers.

Comment author: jpaulson 02 November 2014 06:19:22AM -2 points [-]

I don't understand. Are you saying you could get 2x as much work done in your 40 hour week, or that due to dependencies on other people you cannot possibly do more than 20 hours of productive work per week no matter how many hours you are in the office?

Comment author: singularitard 03 November 2014 07:00:22PM *  1 point [-]

I suspect if you took a look at your life, there are a lot of things you don't understand.

Comment author: jpaulson 04 November 2014 05:49:26AM -2 points [-]

I think a more likely explanation is that people just like to complain. Why would people do things that everyone thought were a waste of time? (At my office, we have meetings and email too, but I usually think they are good ways to communicate with people and not a waste of time)

Also, you didn't answer my question. It sounds like your answer is that you are compelled to waste 20 hours of time every week?

Comment author: singularitard 05 November 2014 03:58:49PM *  1 point [-]

I didn't answer your question because it was loaded and ridiculous. Quit feigning ignorance to bait for attention, you sad little boy