ChristianKl comments on question: the 40 hour work week vs Silicon Valley? - Less Wrong

13 Post author: Florian_Dietz 24 October 2014 12:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (107)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jpaulson 31 October 2014 12:57:11AM 2 points [-]

I work at Google, and I work ~40 hours a week. And that includes breakfast and lunch every day. As far as I can tell, this is typical (for Google).

I think you can get more done by working longer hours...up to a point, and for limited amounts of time. Loss in productivity still means the total work output is going up. I think the break-even point is 60h / week.

Comment author: ChristianKl 31 October 2014 06:32:46PM 1 point [-]

I think you can get more done by working longer hours...up to a point, and for limited amounts of time. Loss in productivity still means the total work output is going up. I think the break-even point is 60h / week.

Does that figure take into account that the bug rate that you produce at 60h/week is going to be higher than at 40h/week?

Comment author: jpaulson 02 November 2014 06:01:34AM 0 points [-]

Sort of. My opinion takes that objection into account.

But on the other hand, I don't have any data to quantitatively refute or support your point.