"no pollution unless you get consent from everyone that pollution could harm," which would literally put us back to the Stone Age.
Stone age people still had fires to warm their mud huts.
I suspect you could feasibly obtain consent from everyone damaged by a wood fire with population density that low.
In the big survey, political views are divided into large categories so that statistics are possible. This article is an attempt to supply a text field so that we can get a little better view of the range of beliefs.
My political views aren't adequately expressed by "libertarian". I call myself a liberal-flavored libertarian, by which I mean that I want the government to hurt people less. The possibility that the government is giving too much to poor people is low on my list of concerns. I also believe that harm-causing processes should be shut down before support systems
So, what political beliefs do you have that don't match the usual meaning of your preferred label?