Lumifer comments on Non-standard politics - Less Wrong

3 Post author: NancyLebovitz 24 October 2014 03:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (231)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 28 October 2014 03:14:56PM 1 point [-]

The crux of the issue is that people will be getting abortions whether they are legal or not

That's not a particularly persuasive argument, to see why replace "getting abortions" with e.g. "stealing" (pro-life people would replace it with "murder").

Comment author: singularitard 28 October 2014 03:55:17PM *  -2 points [-]

Having something done to yourself VS doing something to other people, there's really no comparison here. The science is sound.

Not that people with grade school equivalent knowledge of politics are worth arguing with (I mean you by the way). Dunning-Kruger alarm bells ringing. Don't worry, you'll get laid one day

Comment author: Lumifer 28 October 2014 04:15:21PM *  3 points [-]

Having something done to yourself VS doing something to other people, there's really no comparison here

Heh. It's interesting how you assume the real crux of the issue away.

The real crux (IMHO, of course) is whether and when a fetus stops being a chunk of tissue and begins to be a human being. There are two endpoint views -- at birth and at conception -- and a variety of intermediate positions.

Your post assumes that the fetus is a chunk of tissue so when you are doing something, it's to yourself, not to another person. But that assumption is precisely the root of the disagreement.