= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
NancyLebovitz comments on Open thread, Oct. 27 - Nov. 2, 2014 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (400)
Are these consistent with each other? Should it at least be "Some "people" are worth more than others"?
Words are just labels for empirical clusters. I'm not going to scare-quote people when it has the usual referent used in normal conversation.
What do you mean by solipsism?
My own existence is more real than this universe. Humans and our objective reality are map, not territory.
What does it mean for one thing to be more real than another thing?
Also, when you say something is "map not territory", what do you mean? That the thing in question does not exist, but it resembles something else which does exist? Presumably a map must at least resemble the territory it represents.
Maybe "more fundamental" is clearer. In the same way that friction is less real than electromagnetism.
More fundamental, in what sense? e.g. do you consider yourself to be the cause of other people?
To the extent that there is a cause, yes. Other people are a surface phenomenon.
What do you mean by surface? Do you mean people exist as your perceptions but not otherwise? And is there anything 'beneath' this 'surface', whatever it is?