James_Miller comments on Stupid Questions (10/27/2014) - Less Wrong

15 Post author: drethelin 27 October 2014 09:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (260)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: James_Miller 29 October 2014 02:44:03AM 2 points [-]

I should write that post about investing and the Singularity one day.

The key is predicting what will happen to interest rates.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 29 October 2014 01:11:49PM 1 point [-]

How would you estimate the probability that the post-Singularity world would consider pre-Singularity property to be too silly to be worth bothering with?

Comment author: James_Miller 29 October 2014 05:17:23PM *  4 points [-]

The most likely outcome is that pre-singularity property rights would indeed be meaningless post-singularity because (1) we are all dead, (2) wealth is distributed independent of pre-singularity rights, (3) scarcity has been abolished (meaning we have found a way of creating new free energy), or (4) the world is weird.

The Fermi paradox causes me to give higher weight to (1), (3) and (4).

Comment author: eeuuah 01 November 2014 11:29:52PM 2 points [-]

Shouldn't outcome 2 be given higher weight on account of having actually happened before? Reallocation of wealth seems to be a pretty common outcome of shifts in power.

Comment author: James_Miller 02 November 2014 12:44:15AM 2 points [-]

Yes