SilentCal comments on A discussion of heroic responsibility - Less Wrong

39 Post author: Swimmer963 29 October 2014 04:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (215)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: SilentCal 31 October 2014 06:24:09PM *  3 points [-]

Superrationality isn't a substitute for heroic responsibility, it's a complement. Heroic responsibility is the ability to <i>really ask</i> the question, "Should I break the rules in a radical effort to change the world?" Superrationality is the tool that will allow you to usually get the correct, negative answer.

ETA: When Harry first articulates the concept of heroic responsibility, it's conspicuously missing superrationality. I think that's an instance of the character not being the author. But I think it's later suggested that McGonagall could also use some heroic responsibility, and this clearly does not mean that she should be trying to take over the world.

Comment author: [deleted] 01 November 2014 02:37:59PM 0 points [-]

I agree completely. McGonnagal has decision-making authority, so she is exactly the person who should be thinking in terms of absolute responsibility rather than in terms of convention.