eli_sennesh comments on Agency and Life Domains - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 16 November 2014 01:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (68)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 17 November 2014 04:06:12PM 0 points [-]

You can assume, fairly simply, that the things I retrospectively consciously endorse were actually good for me.

I think you're confusing regret or lack of it with "actually good for me". Certainly, the future-you can evaluate the consequences of some action better than the past-you, but he's still only future-you, not an arbiter of what is "actually good" and what is not.

Comment author: [deleted] 18 November 2014 08:38:19AM 0 points [-]

There's no confusion here if we use a naturalistic definition of "actually good". If we use a nonnaturalistic definition, then of course the question becomes bloody nonsense. I would hope you'd have the charity not to automatically interpret what my question nonsensically!

Comment author: Lumifer 18 November 2014 06:43:43PM 1 point [-]

There's no confusion here if we use a naturalistic definition of "actually good"

I have no idea what a naturalistic definition of "actually good" would be.