examachine comments on Musk on AGI Timeframes - Less Wrong

19 Post author: Artaxerxes 17 November 2014 01:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (70)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: examachine 18 November 2014 03:50:32AM 0 points [-]

Well, achieving better than human performance on a sufficiently wide benchmark. Preparing that benchmark is almost as hard as writing the code, it seems. Of course, any such estimates must be taken with a grain of salt, but I think that conceptually solid AGI projects have a significant chance by that time (including OpenCog), although previously I have argued that neuromorphic approaches are likely to succeed by 2030, latest.

Comment author: Lumifer 18 November 2014 05:29:42AM 2 points [-]

achieving better than human performance on a sufficiently wide benchmark

You understand that you just replaced some words with others without clarifying anything, right? "Sufficiently wide" doesn't mean anything.