What I wrote wasn't intended as a defense of anything; it was an attempt to understand what you were saying. Since you completely ignored the questions I asked (which is of course your prerogative), I am none the wiser.

I think you may have misunderstood my conjecture about prejudice; if an AI professes to "care" but doesn't in fact act in ways we recognize as caring, and if we conclude that actually it doesn't care in the sense we meant, that's not prejudice. (But it is looking at "outcomes", which you disdained before.)