RobinHanson comments on Superintelligence 18: Life in an algorithmic economy - Less Wrong

4 Post author: KatjaGrace 13 January 2015 02:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Sebastian_Hagen 14 January 2015 01:23:11AM *  0 points [-]

Their physical appearance and surroundings would be what we'd see as very luxurious.

Only to the extent that this does not distract them from work. To the extent that it does, ems that care about such things would be outcompeted (out of existence, given a sufficiently competitive economy) by ones that are completely indifferent to them, and focus all their mental capacity on their job.

Comment author: RobinHanson 14 January 2015 07:47:02PM 1 point [-]

Yes, the surroundings would need to be not overly distracting. But that is quite consistent with luxurious.

Comment author: diegocaleiro 10 February 2015 11:36:52PM 1 point [-]

Because as Einstein is attributed to have said, Kingsley said and positive psychology confirmed: “We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us really happy is something to be enthusiastic about.”