nydwracu comments on Neo-reactionaries, why are you neo-reactionary? - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Capla 17 November 2014 10:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (616)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 20 November 2014 04:36:22AM 10 points [-]

That being said, there's ample discussion already on Slate Star Codex, and I wouldn't want to see it crowding out other topics here.

I keep hearing people say this. This is a rationalist site; why hasn't anyone gone out and generated some statistics?

Comment author: Prismattic 21 November 2014 01:16:23AM 1 point [-]

I don't understand which half of that sentence you are objecting to, or what statistic in particular you would be looking for.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 November 2014 02:47:21AM 5 points [-]

"crowding out"

Comment author: Prismattic 21 November 2014 04:52:59AM 2 points [-]

Ok, but I didn't say this had already happened. I said it is something I would not want to see happen in future. Possibly you were just using my comment as a convenient anchor for a point you were already prepping for someone else, but it doesn't really make sense to address it to me.