= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
bogus comments on Neo-reactionaries, why are you neo-reactionary? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (616)
Eron, maybe; at least Ozy has supported him. Gamergate, not so much; Ozy has said that ve has no opinion about most Gamergate-related issues, and I don't think Scott has come out in support of it either.
He has probably defended some people who support Gamergate? I'm downvoting you for either failing to make that distinction, or being just completely wrong.
Scott has obliquely said that he doesn't want GG to be discussed on his blog under any circumstances, due to the risk of attracting unsavory and troublesome folks. It's awfully hard to describe that as "support", especially when you compare his attitude towards NRx and yes, even Tumblr!politics.
I apologize to Scott if I have misrepresented his views :-( Gamergate is not coherent as it should be.