drethelin comments on Neo-reactionaries, why are you neo-reactionary? - Less Wrong

10 Post author: Capla 17 November 2014 10:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (616)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Azathoth123 22 November 2014 05:03:54AM 1 point [-]

What's the in practice difference between say, a polyamorous group raising children together in a stable situation and a large, extended family with various cousins and so on?

The fact that their internal dynamics are completely different.

Or to make it even simpler, I see no strong reason to say "you shouldn't be gay" when you could be saying "Hey gay guys, you should form a monogamous pairbond and raise children together for 18 years".

Because:

1) The child is deprived of a mother (or father). And yes the two play different roles in bringing up children.

2) Gays aren't monogamous. One obvious way to see this is to note how much gay culture is based around gay bathhouses. Another way is to image search pictures of gay pride parades.

Comment author: drethelin 22 November 2014 05:44:58AM 2 points [-]

bathhouses and pride parades are a shitty example, but I'll admit that gay guys don't seem to be monogamous after I looked around for studies.

What are the internal dynamics you think are optimal for child-rearing?

Comment author: Azathoth123 22 November 2014 09:17:42PM 5 points [-]

What are the internal dynamics you think are optimal for child-rearing?

I don't know the details and I'm guessing neither does anyone else in this thread. However, stability is good, as well as being raised by people to whom Azathoth has given a desire to care about the child's future, as opposed to who are conditioned to regard the child as a rival for their children.

Comment author: [deleted] 22 November 2014 10:46:38PM 0 points [-]

as well as being raised by people to whom Azathoth has given a desire to care about the child's future, as opposed to who are conditioned to regard the child as a rival for their children

That'd be an argument against all adoptions and orphanages, not just gay adoptions.

Comment author: Azathoth123 22 November 2014 10:51:59PM 3 points [-]

The argument is weaker since ordinary adoptions are better at providing stability.